Friday, March 06, 2009

Less Than One Percent

I've known for decades that I am one of the persons Thoreau imagined when he wrote about marching to the sound of a different drum. I can't really hear my presumptive beat. At a minimum, I adhere to the maxim that the majority of rhythms surrounding me are to be ignored. Perhaps the loudest is the incessant beat of American consumerism. We are told that the economy is in deep trouble because Americans are not buying enough, that they are now actually saving money. It is almost as if the excesses of the last several years were normal, that excess is in fact sustainable.

I am intuitively comforted that the economy collapsed. It did not seem sustainable. I have not checked the status of what could be called my wealth: the value of my home, the value of my retirement account, the value of my savings, much of which took the form of investing in stocks. I can loosely imagine I've "lost" about half of what I thought I had. I don't take comfort in that. Yet on a larger scale, what I thought I "had" was not based on anything I had done, but on what others did: what decisions they made (to buy, or not, credit default swaps; to buy, or not, securitized mortgages; to buy, or not, that new flat screen tv). It seemed like a game outside my window, one that I watched casually, one that I didn't feel a part of.

I think: what was I thinking? I respond: I wasn't. I was bouncing almost carelessly between inaction and reaction, mostly living in the former. I have two cars: one is 9 years old, the other is 18 years old. I don't buy flat screen tv's or designer clothes or vacations. I feel like an alien when I feel compelled to accompany someone to a mall. The consumer society pounds its drums all around me—I am desperate to wear earplugs. How can a culture go forward buying endless landfills of dreck? What is moving it? What does it long for? How does it create value? How long can it last? Today is the 50th anniversary of Barbie.

If the economy were resilient, this recession/depression wouldn't be happening. It's obviously not. Who will win in the long run: resiliency or unrestricted appetite? A cancer cell offers an answer, tho one few wish for.

The photo offers another answer; love costs nothing. It won't increase GDP nor help pay down the deficit. It will, however, generate an unending supply of resiliency.

Monday, March 02, 2009

Sunny Side of the Street

A cooler more reflective voice cautions that in many ways there is nothing new under the sun, that it has always been a few, very few, who over the centuries have pointed toward a brighter light, a sunnier side of the street, and tho their words have been duly noted and distributed, and acknowledged as containing the noblest of truths and wisdom, the follow thru, the execution, the implementation, of these ideas has proceeded at a glacial pace, also duly noted over the centuries. It appears that the best we have now has to be the baseline upon which the best we may have tomorrow will build. Lots of bricks and lots of time to realize our vision, which seems, on the face of the investment we’ve been making for the last couple of centuries, rather lacking in clarity and end game perspectives. As noted elsewhere, the limbic brain has a really large hammerlock on our rational brain, and the effort that the rational brain (with coaching assistance from the Spiritual Mind) must exert to win back some autonomy is nothing short of Herculean. We have The Rule of Law, which in this country may be our most basic ratchet toward cultural evolution, but it too moves in mysterious ways, and certainly not in a straight line. Perhaps my restlessness is simply the outer form of impatience, which of course reveals how much I am tied in to the physical form rather than the eternal formlessness of Spirit. On the (Spiritual) Sunny Side of the street, the limbic brain v. rational brain conflict seems little more than antics, perhaps best characterized by Willy:

To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day
To the last syllable of recorded time,
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more: it is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.

(Macbeth Act 5, Scene 5)

Fundamental Reboot

The real question, tho, is in the imagination of what the 22nd century will be like, and what the “reboot” being discussed by the Davos Society will look like and lead to.

"The world needs to examine the basic operating systems that drive its economies, markets and societies and aim for a “fundamental reboot” to establish a fresh platform based on renewed confidence and trust, and on sustainability, responsibility and ethical principles. That was the over-arching message that 700 of the world’s top thought leaders from business, government, academia and civil society delivered at the end of the inaugural Summit on the Global Agenda, convened by the World Economic Forum in partnership with the Government of Dubai. (9 nov 2008)"
World Economic Forum - Summit on the Global Agenda

I haven’t taken the time to read their reboot report. Perhaps I should reserve my comments until I see what the best and the brightest 700 think. My thought is that the reboot will be meaningless unless there is a whole new picture of how many molecules, and of which kind, are available per person on the planet. It seems that regardless of how many gigawatt hours/person/year are available (i realize my thinking is limited, as I don’t imagine why we would need that kind of power much less where we would get it), we can’t just consume the planet. It seems like we would be eating our young—eating our home—burning the last tree. Short of redesigning life forms including our own, and the life forms of the planet (from bacteria and viruses on up to whales), and doing this without screwing anything up (which I think would be laughable...it would be like we had truly figured out nature and could now take over the controls), we need to back down from the hubris trail and learn to be humble. I think of Joseph Campbell: one spends one’s entire life climbing the ladder of success only to discover, when you get to the top, that it is on the wrong wall.

Slowly Rising Tide

I am slowing coming to some kind of centered, easy and solid comfort with the subtle yet unmistakable power of the rising tide. It may seem achingly slow, but it is not to be discounted for its steady progress. One need do nothing, one (that would be me) can indeed do nothing, about that rising tide, save watch it, express gratitude for it, and perhaps nudge the earth in little almost laughably inconsequential ways to guide the flowing tide into some little channels or create some temporary small advantage. I brew and muse and ponder the origins of this tide, this achingly slow, but steady, rise in awareness. I wonder if it is youth. I wonder if it is the first global fruits of rationality in service to the system instead of to the self (or perhaps, in service to the long term survival of the self by preserving the system upon which the self in utterly and entirely dependent). Not until the late 20th century was there really any reason to imagine that humans could indeed create enough waste to actually impact global planetary functioning (air, water, plants, animals, etc.); prior to the 20th century we could create endless mischief, but nothing on a scale that would give rise to the notion of the 29th day. In some ways we are making enormously fast progress given our millenia of generations in which little changed. What is of course unknown is whether the speed with which the impacts we have already set in motion will be sufficiently reversed by the rising tide of our awareness to avoid some kind of tipping-point collapse. I don’t think the human species will eliminate itself through its own excesses in the next century. It might, tho, give itself a few rather large moments of truth, and nature could take no prisoners in some areas regardless of the apparent development-level of the nation which takes the brunt of her wrath. Wrath is hardly the correct term, as it implies a value judgment, a conscious decision. Nature is simply a systems engineer (may lightning not strike me) extraordinaire; its what works that goes on. If it doesn’t work, those atoms and molecules get recycled and restructured toward another experiment in complexity and interconnectedness. Right now it would seem that human’s are in her cross-hairs; like the rising tide she doesn’t need to do anything precipitous. We, being part of nature, will do whatever It is to ourselves.

I wrote a piece in the centripetus web site extending the definition of centripetal, making references to Michael Meade’s World behind the World book. I suggested that we (humans, culturally) have been breathing in for a few centuries, creating an unprecedented acceleration in creativity and abundance, and, like the great cycles of the universe (including the big bang and the return to silence that preceded it and will apparently follow it), we need to breathe out now. We need to return to the center. The pendulum feels like it has swung too far toward separating us from the planet’s fundamental breathing and the rest of the planet’s various systems. I sense I am a “fin de siecle” guy (The term sometimes encompasses both the closing and onset of an era, as it was felt to be a period of degeneration, but at the same time a period of hope for a new beginning--Wikipedia); I sense I am like Yeats, in:

THE SECOND COMING
Turning and turning in the widening gyre

 The falcon cannot hear the falconer;

 Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;

 Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,

 The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere

 The ceremony of innocence is drowned;

 The best lack all conviction, while the worst

 Are full of passionate intensity.
Surely some revelation is at hand;

 Surely the Second Coming is at hand.

 The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out

 When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi

 Troubles my sight: a waste of desert sand;

 A shape with lion body and the head of a man,

 A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,

 Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it

 Wind shadows of the indignant desert birds.

 The darkness drops again but now I know

 That twenty centuries of stony sleep

 Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,

 And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,

 Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

I don’t sense my confusion as due to the transition of the millennium. I sense it from global narratives brought to me by the scientific community (global climate change, peak oil), from my own observations of the persistence of a huge gap between developed and developing nations, from my own intuitive and emotional withdrawal when I returned to America from the world trip in 1985 after more than a year in Micronesia, from my observations about American abundance excesses which I find deeply offensive, from my rational sense that at least one system responsible for the unrestricted consumption of molecules and production of other molecules (generally called waste) is an economic system that has ignored as immature and/or irrelevant the seven generation proscription of the Iroquois, from my sense of relief and identification with articles like White’s Spirit of Disobedience. I’m searching for my own somewhat stable (he imagines) center, but right now my search process is more of a spiral, i.e., a process, rather than having honed in on a clear landing zone. Like the Shaker Hymn, I’m turning til I come round right, and I sense that I haven’t fully embraced that intuitively essential but rationally messy and emotionally disruptive process.

Monday, April 17, 2006

The Centripetal Road

Centripetal energy is energy directed toward the center. When one swings a ball on a string around in a circle, centrifugal force is the weight or force of the ball wanting to fly out and away; centripetal force is the tension on the string holding the ball from flying off. Flying away is centrifugal / going toward the center is centripetal.

Much of the energy in my daily experience is centrifugal: it is energy directed away from my center. Most news is centrifugal, whether it be on an earth scale (global warming), regional scale (the war in Iraq), or local/intimate scale (a friend with cancer down the street). Many daily tasks are tugs on that string (cooking food is centrifugal, but eating food is centripetal). A rich conversation with a stranger, an unexpected moment where some aspect of life reminds me of beauty: these are centripetal. They move me toward my center. Like footprints in the snow, centripetal tracks reveal where I have been on my journey; I am hoping the stories here will remind us of the richness of each person's journey.

An intuition engine

My intention is to accept the challenges of leading a life led by my intution. It is relatively easy to drive on the rational road. Our culture supports this worldview. What follows here are steps, and perhaps stumbles, on the less traveled road. Welcome.


Robert Frost (1874–1963):

TWO roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both
And be one traveler, long I stood
And looked down one as far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth; 5
Then took the other, as just as fair,
And having perhaps the better claim,
Because it was grassy and wanted wear;
Though as for that the passing there
Had worn them really about the same, 10
And both that morning equally lay
In leaves no step had trodden black.
Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back. 15
I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference. 20